![]() ![]() The only purpose of the Ostwind, as far as i can i see, is just to deny enemy air support, since it seems to be the best vs Air out of all the AA vehicles. ![]() The Ostwind does seem to have superior mobility over the other AA options, but the pathetic damage and "armor" makes it too risky to move closer to enemy infantry and get AT grenaded, but staying too far just reduces the Ostwind's already pathetic damage even further, while giving the enemy infantry a chance to escape due to lack of suppression from Ostwind. Low damage even vs infantry combined with inacurracy just makes me want to know.what is the point of wasting 90 fuel and 280 MP over a StuG instead.Īny other AA vehicle completely overshadow the Ostwind with the Centaur's massive damage vs anything that isnt a medium armor, or the OKW, and Meatchopper halftrack's supperssion. I can argue that buying a couple of 222s is better than this. ![]() From my observation, the Ostwind appears to be.a firecracker launcher, to put it simply. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |